A pair says they weren’t in a position to purchase condoms as a result of a Wisconsin Walgreens worker refused to promote them based mostly on non secular beliefs.
Nathan Pentz tweeted that his associate, Jay, went to Walgreens to purchase condoms at a Hayward location in July however was unable to buy them.
We went to Hayward to get some groceries and a cease at @Walgreens as a result of we had left Jess contraception at residence. As Jess was trying out, cashier John informed her he couldn’t promote her the condoms. “Oh I received them from over there.”
“We are able to, however I received’t due to my religion.” 1/x
— Nate Pentz (@natepentz) July 3, 2022
Pentz additionally stated the worker “embarrass[ed] [her] in entrance of different prospects due to her reproductive selections” when she approached the register.
Pentz expressed that the worker requested if Jay wished a supervisor however she declined.
Walgreens offered an announcement and acknowledged that the worker didn’t violate any retailer insurance policies.
Our insurance policies are designed to make sure we meet the wants of our sufferers and prospects whereas respecting the non secular and ethical beliefs of our group members,” the spokesperson stated. “The situations are uncommon, nonetheless when a group member has an ethical or non secular conviction about finishing a transaction, they’re required to refer the shopper to a different worker or supervisor on responsibility who will full the transaction, which is what occurred on this occasion.
In a observe up tweet, Pentz acknowledged he determined to get a vasectomy.
After the incident at Walgreens, I made an Appoitnment for a vasectomy. https://t.co/MJkcKUEyes
— Nate Pentz (@natepentz) July 21, 2022
In relation to vasectomies, as , the Supreme Courtroom formally overturned the Roe v Wade landmark ruling in June. At the moment, searches for male contraception elevated by 2,471%, in line with Google Traits.
Roomies, do you assume this worker went too far?